Fireweed Republicans: They Really Should Be Wearing A Donkey Suit!

April 7, 2026

Fireweed Republicans: They Really Should Be Wearing A Donkey Suit!

Written by Bill Lussenheide


There’s something incredibly amazing about the sheer brazenness of it all. In an age where

political branding is carefully focus-grouped and polished to a mirror shine, along comes

FIREWEED—a consulting outfit that doesn’t just blur party lines, it joyfully sets them on fire

and roasts marshmallows over the ashes. Marketed with all the subtlety of a neon sign in a

blackout, FIREWEED has apparently found a lucrative niche: helping “Fake Republicans”

sound just convincing enough while cashing checks and taking cues from the other side of the

aisle, AKA Democrats.


Enter Shelley Vance and Russ Nelson, candidates for office in Gallatin, entering from stage left,

waving the GOP banner with one hand while clutching FIREWEED’s playbook in the other. It’s

a performance worthy of community theater—fake smiles, rehearsed lines, and just enough

costume to sell the role. But the script keeps slipping. When your campaign strategy reads

like it was ghostwritten by Democratic consultants, and your funding trail looks like a

liberal’s potluck, people tend to notice.


Of course, we’re told not to worry. Ignore the consultants. Ignore the donations. Ignore the

liberal talking points that sound suspiciously like they were imported wholesale. Just trust the

Republican label, you know that “R” after the name is all you need. It’s a bit like being

handed a can labeled “beef stew” while the aroma screams lentil surprise—you can insist it’s

beef all you want, but eventually someone’s going to lift the lid.


At some point, the question stops being whether this is clever strategy or just plain outright

devilish deception. If you’re going to run like a Democrat, fundraise like a Democrat, and

get coached by Democratic consultants, maybe the boldest, most honest move would be to skip

the costume change entirely. It would save everyone time—and spare voters the awkward

realization that the elephant on the sign is, in fact, wearing a very carefully tailored donkey

suit.


Bill Lussenheide


I-194 won’t stop dark money, vote no
October 1, 2026
Roger Koopman argues I-194 is not a plan to control dark money. It protects out-of-state billionaire funding while targeting Montana businesses, ranches, and nonprofits.
Stylized U.S. Capitol with red and blue paint splashes
By Montana Chamber of Commerce • September 22, 2026
Montana, Kalispell, and Billings chambers urge a No on I-194: it would silence local businesses while out-of-state billionaires could still spend freely.
A brass scales of justice beside a desk lamp on a dark desk, with a blurred person working in the background
By Esther Fishbaugh • September 22, 2026
Most Gallatin County police and sheriffs’ offices have endorsed Jordan Salo for County Attorney. Here’s why they say they won’t back Audrey Cromwell.
Oppose I-133: Don't weaken Montana's Constitution
September 14, 2026
CI-133 Seeks to make placing ballot initiatives on the MT ballot an easier process, therefore circumventing the elected legislature.
Was Gallatin County’s form of government changed without a vote?
September 3, 2026
Part 3: Gallatin County used resolutions to move Treasurer, Administrator, and election duties away from elected officials. The Commission says the form never changed because voters never approved a new label.
Meta logo beside a smartphone scanning a profile card, blue and red on dark background
By Reclaim the Net • August 31, 2026
Meta’s $17B deal isn’t teen limits. The judgment makes adults surrender privacy, ramps up surveillance and account linking—and Meta waived constitutional challenges.
More Posts