How Dark Money PACs Are Trying to Buy Republican Primaries in Montana

May 12, 2026

Share this article

How Dark Money PACs Are Trying to Buy Republican Primaries in Montana

Graphic: dark money in Montana, liberal PACs buying Republican primaries, three cups and state capitol backdrop.

Most Montanans don’t follow campaign finance reports. That’s exactly why groups like Conservatives4MT are able to operate in the shadows.
Here’s how the game works — step by step — in plain English:
1. The Money Comes From the Left
Conservatives4MT is a PAC with a conservative-sounding name.
  Their treasurer is Rep. Ross Fitzgerald, a close ally of Rep. Llew Jones, the de facto leader of the  "Solutions Caucus". But much of its money is coming from Way Back PAC , a liberal-leaning group based in Wyoming. In this cycle alone, Way Back PAC has sent $250,000+  to Conservatives4MT and another $250,000 came from the Western Futures Fund .
The Western Futures Fund itself received millions from the Sixteen Thirty Fund (1630 Fund) , a major left-wing dark money organization that raised $282 million in 2024 alone . Major funders include George Soros and Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss.
Way Back PAC is also endorsing Seth Bodnar for U.S. Senate. Bodnar is running as an Independent. See their endorsements here . Seth Bodnar’s Senate effort appears closely tied to longtime Democratic strategist and Obama's former presidential  campaign manager, Jim Messina through years of personal, institutional, and political collaboration rooted in the Democrats' Tester-Baucus Montana network. The so-called Conservatives4MT independent committee would be challenged to explain why they’re accepting funds from a group endorsing the Progressive Liberal opponent to the GOP’s candidate for the U.S. Senate, especially when the balance of power in the Senate is up for grabs.
2. The PAC Spends the Money on “Independent Expenditures”
Instead of giving the money directly to candidates (which would show up on their campaign reports), Conservatives4MT spends it on ads, mailers, robocalls, and digital campaigns that support certain Republican candidates. This is called an
independent expenditure .
3. The Real Goal
The PAC is helping more moderate or “Solutions Caucus” type Republicans win their primaries. These are often the same candidates who are also paying
Fireweed Campaigns  (a progressive-leaning consulting firm $3,900/month for campaign management services.
Real Local Examples: Candidates receiving significant independent expenditures from Conservatives4MT :
  • Shelley Vance (SD 34)
  • Russ Nelson (HD 67)
  • Jennifer Carlson (HD 68)
  • Ken Walsh (HD 69)
  • Llew Jones (SD 9)
  • David Bedey (SD 43)
  • Brad Barker (HD 55)
  • and others

Candidates who are also directly tied to Fireweed Campaigns  (hiring the firm or receiving coordinated donations from Fireweed staff):
  • Shelley Vance (SD 34)
  • Russ Nelson (HD 67)
  • Llew Jones (SD 9)
  • Ken Walsh (HD 69)
  • David Bedey (SD 43)
  • Brad Barker (HD 55)
  • and others
This is a classic political trick: hide the source of the money and the coordination while still influencing the outcome.
Why This Matters
When out-of-state liberal money flows into Republican primaries disguised as “conservative support,” it tricks voters. Montanans think they’re voting for a strong Republican, but they may be electing someone who will work with Democrats once in office and in many cases, in direct opposition to the Republican party platform and principles.

The Montana Republican Party has already warned about this pattern and labeled many of these candidates “Fireweed Frauds.”
Bottom Line
If a candidate is being heavily boosted by Conservatives4MT, you should look very closely at who they really are — and who is really behind them.

Vote for the True Republicans:
Caleb Hinkle (SD 34), Jed Hinkle (HD 67), Randy Chamberlin (HD 68), and Trevor Walter (HD 69)

Vote Republican on June 2 and keep Montana red.

Recent Posts

Green political poster about Gallatin County Courthouse: “Voters were left out” and “Power moved to hired staff.”
October 12, 2026
Gallatin County commissioners moved power from elected officials to hired staff by resolution. Voters never approved the change.
Sweet deal for Scott MacFarlane? Facilities job opened three days later.
October 9, 2026
Scott MacFarlane left the Gallatin County Commission Feb 17, 2026. Three days later the county posted the Facilities Director job at $112K–$129K. He got it
Who runs Gallatin County elections after 2026?
October 8, 2026
Gallatin County voted 3-0 to take the Election Administrator off the ballot in 2027. Voters will no longer directly hire or fire the person who runs elections.
I-194 won’t stop dark money, vote no
By Roger Koopman • October 1, 2026
Explore how I-194 misleads voters while benefiting out-of-state billionaires. Stay informed on local political rights.
Stylized U.S. Capitol with red and blue paint splashes
September 22, 2026
Montana, Kalispell, and Billings chambers urge a No on I-194: it would silence local businesses while out-of-state billionaires could still spend freely.
Brass scales of justice and a lamp on a desk, with a blurred lawyer writing in the background
September 22, 2026
Most Gallatin County police and sheriffs’ offices have endorsed Jordan Salo for County Attorney. Here’s why they say they won’t back Audrey Cromwell.
Oppose I-133: Don't weaken Montana's Constitution
September 14, 2026
CI-133 Seeks to make placing ballot initiatives on the MT ballot an easier process, therefore circumventing the elected legislature.
Was Gallatin County’s form of government changed without a vote?
September 3, 2026
Part 3: Gallatin County used resolutions to move Treasurer, Administrator, and election duties away from elected officials. The Commission says the form never changed because voters never approved a new label.
Meta logo beside a smartphone facial scan icon and ID card on a dark background
August 31, 2026
Meta’s $17B deal isn’t teen limits. The judgment makes adults surrender privacy, ramps up surveillance and account linking—and Meta waived constitutional challenges.
Gallatin County financial crisis deepens with High-Risk Auditee status
August 21, 2026
Gallatin County faces a deepening financial crisis with $8.5M over-taxation issues. Stay informed on local governance and accountability.
Show More