Bozeman’s Homeless Problem: How a San Francisco Court Decision Made It Worse

May 5, 2026

Share this article

Progressive policies and activist judges tied local governments’ hands for years — and Montana is still paying the price.

Bozeman homeless tents and court gavel over city street with headline: “Made Worse by San Francisco Court Ruling”

For years, Bozeman residents have watched the homeless problem grow. Urban camping exploded along city streets and public rights-of-way. In 2023, the city counted nearly 300 people living in vehicles, tents, and makeshift camps. Even after the city passed a new urban camping ordinance in late 2024 and reduced visible encampments, the overall number of people experiencing homelessness in Gallatin County continues to rise.
Why has this been so hard to fix?
The answer goes back to a controversial court decision from the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. In the 2018 case Martin v. Boise , activist judges ruled that cities and states cannot criminalize sleeping or camping in public if there are not enough shelter beds available. This ruling applied across the entire 9th Circuit — including all of Montana.
For years, this decision effectively gave people experiencing homelessness a constitutional “right” to live on sidewalks, in parks, and on public property. Local governments in Bozeman and across Montana had their hands tied. They couldn’t enforce basic anti-camping laws without first guaranteeing shelter space for every single person — an impossible standard that progressive advocates and left-leaning judges loved.
The result? More visible encampments, more public safety issues, more strain on local services, and more frustration for working families and businesses in Bozeman.
Thankfully, the U.S. Supreme Court finally overturned the worst parts of the Martin ruling in 2024 (City of Grants Pass v. Johnson). Cities now have more tools to address street camping and protect public spaces.
But the damage was already done. Years of progressive policies — from activist court decisions in San Francisco to local leaders who prioritized ideology over practical solutions — helped create and prolong the problem we see today in the Gallatin Valley.
Montana didn’t choose this path. Progressive left policies and out-of-touch court rulings imposed it on us.
The only way to keep pushing back is to elect leaders who put public safety, personal responsibility, and Montana values first.  Vote Republican on June 2 — and keep Bozeman and Gallatin County focused on real solutions.

Recent Posts

Green political poster about Gallatin County Courthouse: “Voters were left out” and “Power moved to hired staff.”
October 12, 2026
Gallatin County commissioners moved power from elected officials to hired staff by resolution. Voters never approved the change.
Sweet deal for Scott MacFarlane? Facilities job opened three days later.
October 9, 2026
Scott MacFarlane left the Gallatin County Commission Feb 17, 2026. Three days later the county posted the Facilities Director job at $112K–$129K. He got it
Who runs Gallatin County elections after 2026?
October 8, 2026
Gallatin County voted 3-0 to take the Election Administrator off the ballot in 2027. Voters will no longer directly hire or fire the person who runs elections.
I-194 won’t stop dark money, vote no
By Roger Koopman • October 1, 2026
Explore how I-194 misleads voters while benefiting out-of-state billionaires. Stay informed on local political rights.
Stylized U.S. Capitol with red and blue paint splashes
September 22, 2026
Montana, Kalispell, and Billings chambers urge a No on I-194: it would silence local businesses while out-of-state billionaires could still spend freely.
Brass scales of justice and a lamp on a desk, with a blurred lawyer writing in the background
September 22, 2026
Most Gallatin County police and sheriffs’ offices have endorsed Jordan Salo for County Attorney. Here’s why they say they won’t back Audrey Cromwell.
Oppose I-133: Don't weaken Montana's Constitution
September 14, 2026
CI-133 Seeks to make placing ballot initiatives on the MT ballot an easier process, therefore circumventing the elected legislature.
Was Gallatin County’s form of government changed without a vote?
September 3, 2026
Part 3: Gallatin County used resolutions to move Treasurer, Administrator, and election duties away from elected officials. The Commission says the form never changed because voters never approved a new label.
Meta logo beside a smartphone facial scan icon and ID card on a dark background
August 31, 2026
Meta’s $17B deal isn’t teen limits. The judgment makes adults surrender privacy, ramps up surveillance and account linking—and Meta waived constitutional challenges.
Gallatin County financial crisis deepens with High-Risk Auditee status
August 21, 2026
Gallatin County faces a deepening financial crisis with $8.5M over-taxation issues. Stay informed on local governance and accountability.
Show More