Supreme Court Race Highlights Clear Choice: Biological Reality vs. Progressive Ideology
Clear choice between biological reality and dangerous progressive ideology
Rep. Amy Regier recently published a powerful opinion piece that lays bare the stark differences between the two candidates for the Montana Supreme Court.
In one recent case, a male convict with a violent criminal history asked to be transferred into a women’s prison after claiming to identify as female. Judge Dan Wilson firmly rejected the request. He ruled based on biological reality — recognizing that the inmate “is and remains both genetically and anatomically male” — and protected the privacy, safety, and dignity of the female inmates.
Contrast that with Amy Eddy and the activist wing of the Montana Supreme Court.
In a separate ruling, the court struck down Montana’s common-sense law that prevented individuals from changing their biological sex on official government documents. This decision opens the door for biological males to enter women’s prisons, women’s shelters, locker rooms, and sports — all under the guise of “inclusion.”
By supporting this ideology, Amy Eddy is effectively prioritizing the feelings of men over the fundamental rights of women and girls to privacy, safety, and dignity in vulnerable spaces.
This isn’t compassion. It’s a dangerous denial of biological reality that puts real women and girls at risk.
Judge Dan Wilson has shown he will uphold objective truth and protect Montana families.
Amy Eddy represents the activist mindset that puts ideology above women’s safety.
Gallatin County Republicans strongly support Judge Dan Wilson for the Montana Supreme Court.
We need justices who defend women’s rights and biological reality — not those who sacrifice them on the altar of progressive politics.
Read Rep. Amy Regier’s full opinion piece here: Ruling highlights differences in Supreme Court candidates
Vote for common sense and women’s safety this June 2.
