Resolution Opposing Ranked Choice Voting & Jungle Primaries

GCRCC • January 19, 2024

Share this article

WHEREAS , the scheme of so-called “Ranked Choice Voting” (hereinafter RCV), as well as the Jungle Primary are starting to be promoted in the State of Montana;


WHEREAS , America has operated on a uniform, well-understood election system for over two hundred years;


WHEREAS , RCV schemes are more complex than our traditional one person, one vote system;


WHEREAS , RCV schemes require each voter to “rank” candidates on their ballot, thereby requiring each voter to become informed about the numerous candidate’s positions, policies, backgrounds, philosophies, and views;


WHEREAS , casting a vote in a RCV scheme is difficult, instructions are cumbersome, and ballot error rates are higher that for those of traditional elections, resulting in more citizens having their votes thrown away;


WHEREAS , in traditional elections, every correctly executed ballot is counted, but under a RCV scheme of “ballot exhaustion”, even ballots which follow the instructions to the letter can be thrown out if the voter ranked a candidate who is no longer in contention, while being required to vote for all candidates on the ballot, including those he/she may not support.


WHEREAS , RCV changes and delays the election counting process by requiring ballots to be transported to a centralized location for counting due to multiple rounds of tabulations in the event of an instant runoff, causing delays of days or weeks in the delivery of election results;


WHEREAS , districts using RCV have been found to have lower voter turnout rates;


WHEREAS , the “jungle primary”, (sometimes referred to as a “blanket primary”, “open primary” or “top two primary”) is an election in which all candidates for elected office run in the same primary regardless of political party, leaving the top two candidates who receive the most votes to advance to the next round, as in a run-off election.


WHEREAS , in a jungle primary there is no separate nomination process for candidates before the first round to narrow the field, making it possible that two candidates of the same party could advance to the second round;


WHEREAS, a jungle primary results in electing candidates who appeal to both/all parties;


WHEREAS, supporters of RCV and jungle primaries seek to disempower party primaries;


therefore be it


RESOLVED, That the Gallatin County Republican Central Committee rejects Ranked Choice Voting, Jungle Primaries, and all other similar schemes which increase election distrust, suppress voter turnout, disenfranchise voters, eliminate the historic political party system, and depend upon expensive and confusing technology and unelected bureaucrats to manage it: and


Susan D. Evans

Secretary

Recent Posts

Green political poster about Gallatin County Courthouse: “Voters were left out” and “Power moved to hired staff.”
October 12, 2026
Gallatin County commissioners moved power from elected officials to hired staff by resolution. Voters never approved the change.
Sweet deal for Scott MacFarlane? Facilities job opened three days later.
October 9, 2026
Scott MacFarlane left the Gallatin County Commission Feb 17, 2026. Three days later the county posted the Facilities Director job at $112K–$129K. He got it
Who runs Gallatin County elections after 2026?
October 8, 2026
Gallatin County voted 3-0 to take the Election Administrator off the ballot in 2027. Voters will no longer directly hire or fire the person who runs elections.
I-194 won’t stop dark money, vote no
By Roger Koopman • October 1, 2026
Explore how I-194 misleads voters while benefiting out-of-state billionaires. Stay informed on local political rights.
Stylized U.S. Capitol with red and blue paint splashes
September 22, 2026
Montana, Kalispell, and Billings chambers urge a No on I-194: it would silence local businesses while out-of-state billionaires could still spend freely.
Brass scales of justice and a lamp on a desk, with a blurred lawyer writing in the background
September 22, 2026
Most Gallatin County police and sheriffs’ offices have endorsed Jordan Salo for County Attorney. Here’s why they say they won’t back Audrey Cromwell.
Oppose I-133: Don't weaken Montana's Constitution
September 14, 2026
CI-133 Seeks to make placing ballot initiatives on the MT ballot an easier process, therefore circumventing the elected legislature.
Was Gallatin County’s form of government changed without a vote?
September 3, 2026
Part 3: Gallatin County used resolutions to move Treasurer, Administrator, and election duties away from elected officials. The Commission says the form never changed because voters never approved a new label.
Meta logo beside a smartphone facial scan icon and ID card on a dark background
August 31, 2026
Meta’s $17B deal isn’t teen limits. The judgment makes adults surrender privacy, ramps up surveillance and account linking—and Meta waived constitutional challenges.
Gallatin County financial crisis deepens with High-Risk Auditee status
August 21, 2026
Gallatin County faces a deepening financial crisis with $8.5M over-taxation issues. Stay informed on local governance and accountability.
Show More