Gallatin County Attorney Takes ICE Dispute to Supreme Court Instead of Complying with AG Knudsen

May 4, 2026

Audrey Cromwell files petition seeking judicial clarification rather than directing her office to share confidential criminal justice information with federal ICE agents

Gallatin County Attorney Audrey Cromwell takes ICE dispute to Montana Supreme Court

Gallatin County Attorney Audrey Cromwell announced today that she has filed a petition with the Montana Supreme Court asking the justices to resolve her ongoing standoff with Attorney General Austin Knudsen over sharing Confidential Criminal Justice Information (CCJI) with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).


In the filing, Cromwell claims she has “no policy to rescind” and accuses the Attorney General of issuing “theatrical directives” instead of providing a formal legal opinion. She argues that releasing the information could expose the county to liability and violate Montanans’ constitutional right to privacy.


Gallatin County Republicans continue to believe this is the wrong approach.


Public safety should not be delayed by legal maneuvering or endless court proceedings. When local officials refuse to fully cooperate with federal law enforcement on criminal justice matters, they put the safety of every resident in Gallatin County at risk. Montana is not a sanctuary jurisdiction, and our elected officials should not be acting like one.


This latest move by Cromwell — filing suit instead of simply directing her office to comply with the Attorney General’s reasonable request — only prolongs the uncertainty and keeps the focus on legal technicalities rather than protecting our communities.


The Gallatin County Republican Central Committee stands firmly with Attorney General Austin Knudsen and full cooperation between state and federal law enforcement. We will continue to monitor this situation closely.


We urge every conservative in the Gallatin Valley to stay informed and make your voice heard — especially in the June 2 Republican primary. We need elected officials at every level who prioritize public safety and the rule of law over delay tactics and privacy excuses that shield criminal activity.


Read the full Supreme Court filing here:

https://supremecourtdocket.mt.gov/case-info/active/29178


Previous coverage on this issue:


Oppose I-133: Don't weaken Montana's Constitution
September 14, 2026
CI-133 Seeks to make placing ballot initiatives on the MT ballot an easier process, therefore circumventing the elected legislature.
Was Gallatin County’s form of government changed without a vote?
September 3, 2026
Part 3: Gallatin County used resolutions to move Treasurer, Administrator, and election duties away from elected officials. The Commission says the form never changed because voters never approved a new label.
Meta logo beside a smartphone scanning a profile card, blue and red on dark background
By Reclaim the Net August 31, 2026
Meta’s $17B deal isn’t teen limits. The judgment makes adults surrender privacy, ramps up surveillance and account linking—and Meta waived constitutional challenges.
Gallatin County financial crisis deepens with High-Risk Auditee status
August 21, 2026
Gallatin County remains a High-Risk Auditee after a second Disclaimer of Opinion. An $8.5 million over-taxation error, unpaid fines, and unanswered questions about accountability continue to raise concerns for taxpayers.
Cromwell faces criticism over plea deals and rising case dismissals
August 19, 2026
Gallatin County Attorney Audrey Cromwell faces growing criticism from Attorney General Knudsen and local law enforcement over plea deals and a sharp rise in case dismissals, including domestic violence cases.
Gallatin County receives second Disclaimer of Opinion on FY2023 audit
August 18, 2026
Auditors issued a Disclaimer of Opinion on Gallatin County’s FY2023 financial statements — the most severe possible outcome. Cash remains unreconciled since 2018 and every corrective action is listed as “Ongoing.”
More Posts